Data Methodology: Adoption data is based on public tech stack disclosures, job postings, case studies, and verified enterprise reports analyzed by UsedBy.ai. Showing 24 verified enterprise adoptions. More data being indexed continuously.
Decision Guide
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on real enterprise adoption patterns
Choose Hugging Face if...
- You're in Artificial Intelligence (23% of users are)
- You want to try before buying (free trial available)
UsedBy Exclusive Data
Industry Adoption Patterns
See which industries prefer each tool based on real adoption data
Hugging Face by Industry
Artificial Intelligence23%
DevTools & Infrastructure15%
Cybersecurity8%
Telecommunications8%
Legal & Compliance8%
Weights & Biases by Industry
Artificial Intelligence18%
Automotive Manufacturing9%
Media & Publishing9%
Sales Tech & CRM9%
Marketing Tech9%
Real User Feedback
What Users Say
Testimonials from verified enterprise users
No testimonials available yet
“Weights & Biases helps us manage thousands of ML experiments efficiently”
Meta AI
ML Engineering, Meta
2 Companies Use Both
These enterprises have integrated both tools into their stack
Hugging Face vs Weights & Biases: Your Questions Answered
Hugging Face has higher enterprise adoption with 13 companies using it, compared to 11 for Weights & Biases. This suggests stronger market validation for Hugging Face.
Yes, 2 companies in our database use both Hugging Face and Weights & Biases in their tech stack. This includes Microsoft, Meta. Using both tools together is a validated enterprise strategy.
Hugging Face is particularly strong in Artificial Intelligence (23% of adopters), while Weights & Biases dominates in Artificial Intelligence (18%). Choose based on your industry's prevailing stack.
For startups, consider: Hugging Face offers freemium pricing with a free trial, while Weights & Biases uses competitive pricing. Both are validated by enterprise use, ensuring scalability as you grow.
