Data Methodology: Adoption data is based on public tech stack disclosures, job postings, case studies, and verified enterprise reports analyzed by UsedBy.ai. Showing 44 verified enterprise adoptions. More data being indexed continuously.
Decision Guide
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on real enterprise adoption patterns
UsedBy Exclusive Data
Industry Adoption Patterns
See which industries prefer each tool based on real adoption data
Listen by Industry
Media & Publishing12%
Marketing Tech12%
Fashion & Apparel12%
Management Consulting8%
Artificial Intelligence8%
AWS Bedrock by Industry
Marketing Tech18%
Insurance & InsurTech12%
Airlines & Aviation Services12%
Automotive Manufacturing6%
Fintech & Payments6%
Real User Feedback
What Users Say
Testimonials from verified enterprise users
No testimonials available yet
“Scaled from 500M to 5B tokens daily with 80% cost reduction using Bedrock”
Robinhood Engineering
AI Platform, Robinhood
1 Companies Use Both
These enterprises have integrated both tools into their stack
Listen vs AWS Bedrock: Your Questions Answered
Listen has higher enterprise adoption with 27 companies using it, compared to 17 for AWS Bedrock. This suggests stronger market validation for Listen.
Yes, 1 companies in our database use both Listen and AWS Bedrock in their tech stack. This includes Robinhood. Using both tools together is a validated enterprise strategy.
Listen is particularly strong in Media & Publishing (12% of adopters), while AWS Bedrock dominates in Marketing Tech (18%). Choose based on your industry's prevailing stack.
For startups, consider: Listen offers flexible pricing, while AWS Bedrock uses competitive pricing. Both are validated by enterprise use, ensuring scalability as you grow.
Related Comparisons
Explore more head-to-head matchups in this category
