Data Methodology: Adoption data is based on public tech stack disclosures, job postings, case studies, and verified enterprise reports analyzed by UsedBy.ai. Showing 56 verified enterprise adoptions. More data being indexed continuously.
Decision Guide
Which One Should You Choose?
Based on real enterprise adoption patterns
UsedBy Exclusive Data
Industry Adoption Patterns
See which industries prefer each tool based on real adoption data
Cursor by Industry
Data & Analytics20%
Artificial Intelligence20%
Logistics & Supply Chain10%
DevTools & Infrastructure10%
Fintech & Payments10%
GitHub copilot by Industry
Data & Analytics8%
Logistics & Supply Chain8%
DevTools & Infrastructure8%
Automotive Manufacturing8%
Telecommunications8%
6 Companies Use Both
These enterprises have integrated both tools into their stack
Cursor vs GitHub copilot: Your Questions Answered
GitHub copilot leads in enterprise adoption with 36 companies, versus 20 for Cursor. This indicates broader market acceptance for GitHub copilot.
Yes, 6 companies in our database use both Cursor and GitHub copilot in their tech stack. This includes Stripe, Sendbird, Datadog. Using both tools together is a validated enterprise strategy.
Cursor is particularly strong in Data & Analytics (20% of adopters), while GitHub copilot dominates in Data & Analytics (8%). Choose based on your industry's prevailing stack.
For startups, consider: Cursor offers freemium pricing with a free trial, while GitHub copilot uses subscription pricing with a free trial available. Both are validated by enterprise use, ensuring scalability as you grow.
Related Comparisons
Explore more head-to-head matchups in this category
